Weeks of Harvest – Jeremiah 5:24

Originally posted on 1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources:

Weeks of Harvest – Jeremiah 5:24

The Bible does not explicitly describe Shavuot, the Festival of Weeks, as the day of the giving of the Torah. We can calculate that the date of the festival coincides with that historic revelation but the explicit association is not there. One explanation given for this conspicuous omission is that there is no one day of the “giving of the Torah”. Every day is a day when God grants teaching to His people as they study His word with awe and love. To point to one day as the day of the “giving of the Torah” would imply that there is a limit to God’s granting of teaching to His people when in fact God grants His people wisdom every day of the year (Proverbs 2:6).

I would like to approach this issue from another angle.

The exodus from Egypt is described in the…

View original 399 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Respect for the Process

Originally posted on 1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources:

Respect for the Process

Christians and Moslems make strong claims about their respective faiths. They both believe that people who do not subscribe to their particular brand of Christianity or Islam will suffer eternally. They do not hesitate to share this belief with people outside of their faith.

With a love for humanity in their hearts, and I do not say this sarcastically, the missionaries of Islam and Christianity attempt to save as many people as possible from the fires of hell. If the fear of hellfire will motivate a prospective convert to join the community of believers, then why should this fear not be harnessed for the cause?

Let us shift our focus to the prospective convert. We are obviously talking about an individual who has not believed in the religion of the missionary and is now listening to the arguments presented on behalf of this belief that is…

View original 505 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Festival of Weeks – Isaiah 41:8

Festival of Weeks – Isaiah 41:8

 Love doesn’t calculate. Love does not hear the discouraging voices.  Love is innocent. Love yearns and it follows. But love does not ask: what will I gain? Could I really get there?

Scripture doesn’t throw around the term: “love” very lightly. In all of Scripture, Abraham is the only one that God describes as: “the one who loved me”. (It is said of Solomon: “and he loved the Lord” – 1 Kings 3:3, and David declares: “I love you Lord of my strength” – Psalm 18:2. Indeed, David’s love for God still inspires Israel today and Solomon wrote the ultimate love-song; Song of Songs, but Abraham still stands out with his love for God highlighted as a part of his very identity, and this from God, in the first person.)

Abraham did not know where his love would lead him to. Abraham did not know where it could possibly lead him to. How could a created being form a bond with the Creator of all? But love does not calculate – love just follows. Abraham saw that God is kindness, he followed kindness. Abraham saw that God is truth, he followed truth. He didn’t stop to ask himself: how could I ever reach God’s kindness or God’s truth? Abraham did not hear the discouraging voice that contended: “you will never be righteous in His eyes” – “you are inescapably tainted with the sin of Adam”. Abraham yearned and he followed.

Ruth didn’t calculate either. She didn’t ask herself: what hope is there for a Moabite widow in God’s nation? She just followed.

Israel didn’t calculate. They did not ask themselves: where will this relationship end up? How could we, created beings, form any meaningful relationship with the Creator of all? They just followed (Jeremiah 2:2).

The Festival of weeks is not about love. Passover is about love. Passover is when Israel followed God into the unknown, into the impossible. Passover is followed by seven weeks. Seven weeks of yearning. Seven weeks of following.

The Festival of weeks is God’s reciprocation to sincere love. On this day God reached out to Israel with an eternal embrace. He presented His beloved nation with the innermost expression of His will; His holy Torah. God formed an eternal bond with this nation that loved Him; a bond that would have been impossible to imagine. A bond between Creator and created. But love does not follow rules.

Ruth’s love brought David and Solomon to the world. Ruth’s love for God brought her to the center of God’s plan for the universe. She could never have dreamed of such an outcome. But love does not look at the outcome. Love simply follows.

God responded to Abraham’s love with Isaac, the child of laughter. Laughter – because it does not make sense. A child to one hundred year old man?! Not just any child. But a child that will father a nation of human beings that will be granted an eternal commission from God – a commission to carry the truth, the holiness and the blessing of the Creator of all throughout the corridors of history. Is it possible for created beings to be entrusted with the work of the Creator of all?! Could Abraham have imagined that this is where his love would lead him to? Of-course not! But Abraham wasn’t looking for a payoff when he began his journey of love. Abraham simply loved, and love does not calculate.

Posted in Holidays | Leave a comment

The Guide

yourphariseefriend:

This article can be downloaded as a pdf file from our website – http://www.judaismresources.com/documents.html

Originally posted on 1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources:

The Guide

(A Jewish Encounter with a Missionary)

The conversation was unsettling. Your friend has just revealed to you that he or she now believes in Jesus, or Yeshua as he or she prefers to call him. No, your friend insists, this is not a conversion to Christianity. Jesus is the “Jewish” Messiah, and I am fulfilling my destiny as a Jew by putting my faith in him.

The thoughts and emotions rush through your inner being. Jews don’t believe in Jesus! So many Jews sacrificed so much in order to avoid the step your friend has just taken. You and your friend have always identified yourselves as Jews in a Christian world. That was something that you felt good about. It was not always comfortable, but you felt part of something holy, timeless and true. Now that is gone. Or is it? Your friend claims that his or her…

View original 3,316 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Totality of Scripture

The Totality of Scripture

Judaism and Christianity are two different belief systems. They differ from each other on foundational issues such as the identity of God and atonement from sin. Yet these two disparate belief systems point to the same Jewish Bible as a fundamental element of their respective faiths. The doctrines of Judaism and Christianity are diametrical opposites, yet the proponents of both sides of the argument find encouragement in the pages of the same book.

It is obvious that only one of these belief systems can be reading the book correctly. The adherents of one faith are following the true intent of the Divine Author, while the adherents of the other faith must be misusing the book.

There are two methods we can use to determine which of these two belief systems is following the true intent of the Author. We can either focus on the details, or we can look at the big picture.

In order to focus on the details, we would examine each and every one of the passages that the proponents of both faiths present to substantiate their respective doctrines. We must study each passage to see which interpretation is validated by the text. Is it the Jewish interpretation or is it the Christian interpretation?

A thorough analysis of the various scriptural quotations is a worthwhile exercise. A serious study of these scriptural passages will reveal that the doctrines of Judaism are based on a direct and straight-forward reading of the text. At the same time this examination will confirm that the scriptural quotations of the missionary are being wrenched out of their immediate contexts. This study has convinced many committed Christians to embrace Judaism.

There is however another method that will help us determine which of these two belief systems is being loyal to scripture, and which is misusing scripture. We need to step back and look at the big picture. We need to examine the total approach to scripture employed by both Judaism and Christianity. We must ask ourselves if there any major differences that separate these two belief systems in their general approach to scripture.

When we contrast the scriptural quotations presented by the Jew against those presented by the missionary, the disparity between them is immediately obvious. The Jewish quotations tower above the Christian quotations in three distinct areas. The scriptural quotations presented by the Jew are; 1) direct, 2) they are clear 3) and they provide comprehensive support for the doctrine in question. In contrast, the quotations presented by the missionary are 1) never direct, 2) they are not clear, 3) and they fail to support the most significant points of the Christian doctrine in question. This study clearly demonstrates that it is Judaism that is in line with scripture, while the Church is abusing the same document.

1) Direct

A scriptural quotation can be considered direct when the Divine Author places the passage in a setting that clearly identifies it as a teaching on the doctrine in question. We will utilize two examples to illustrate this principle. We will examine the Jewish teaching on idolatry, and the Jewish teaching on atonement. The proponents of Judaism quote the passage of Deuteronomy 4:9-39 to establish a basis for the Jewish doctrine on idolatry. The passage of Ezekiel 33:10-20 is quoted in order to validate the Jewish doctrine on atonement from sin.

The passage of Deuteronomy 4:9-39 is clearly marked as a teaching on the issue of idolatry. The Author repeatedly emphasizes that this is the very point He is trying to make. “Lest you become corrupt and make a carved idol, the similitude of any figure…” (verse 16). “Take heed to yourselves lest you forget the covenant of the Lord your God that He made with you and you create for yourselves a carved idol …” (verse 23). “Know therefore this day and consider it in your heart that the Lord, He is God in the heavens above and on the earth below there is none else” (verse 39). The Author of scriptures takes the trouble to ensure that the readers associate this particular passage with the prohibition against idolatry.

Likewise, the passage of Ezekiel 33:10-20 opens with the rhetorical statement “ye have said – our sins and transgressions are upon us, how then shall we live?” The Author of scripture presents the question that every sinner must face; how can I deal with my guilt? The Author of scripture makes it clear that a teaching on the issue of forgiveness from sin is about to be presented.

These two passages quoted by the advocates of Judaism directly address the doctrinal issues that they are called upon to support. The Divine Author ensured that no one can doubt that the passage in Deuteronomy presents a teaching on idolatry, while the passage in Ezekiel teaches forgiveness from sin.

The passages quoted by the proponents of Christianity do not share this elemental property. These passages are not placed in a setting that would indicate that the doctrine in question is being addressed in this passage. The scriptural quotations of the missionary do not directly relate to the doctrines they are called upon to support.

2) Clear

A scriptural quotation can be considered clear when the Divine Author chose words that do not leave room for debate. We will turn to the same two passages that we mentioned above in order to illustrate this point.

The passage in Deuteronomy 4:9-39 clearly provides focus and direction for the worship of the Jewish people. “Only take heed for yourself and guard your souls exceedingly, lest you forget the things that your eyes have seen and lest they depart from your heart all the days of your life, and you shall make them known to your children and to your children’s children” (verse 9). “And the Lord spoke to you from the midst of the fire, you heard the voice of words, but saw no form, only a voice” (verse 12). “Take therefore good heed unto yourselves for you saw no manner of form on the day the Lord spoke to you in Horeb from the midst of the fire. Lest you become corrupt and make a carved idol the similitude of any figure…” (verses 15,16). The passage points to the revelation at Sinai as God’s directive to the people of Israel concerning the direction of their worship. Idolatry is prohibited because they saw no form on that occasion. Furthermore this passage reveals that God expects this revelation to be preserved through the teaching of the Jewish nation. No one ever disputed this interpretation. The words that God chose to communicate this message leave no room for another interpretation.

The same holds true for the passage in Ezekiel 33:10-20. The words that God employed in the communication of this message leave no room for doubt in the mind of the reader. “And when I tell the wicked you shall surely die and he repents from his sin and does justice and righteousness. If the wicked returns the pledge, repays for his theft, follows the statutes of life without committing iniquity he shall surely live, he shall not die. All his sins that he committed will not be remembered for him, he has done justice and righteousness, he shall surely live” (verses 14-16). The teaching is crystal clear. When the sinner turns from his evil ways, God does not remember his sins. God did not leave any room for the reader to question the clarity of the message.

The passages quoted by the proponents of Christianity cannot be considered clear. Every one of the major scriptural passages presented in support of Christian doctrine is the subject of fierce debate. It is not only the Jewish scholars who reject the missionary interpretations of these passages. Many Christian scholars dispute the missionary rendition of these passages. The scriptural quotations presented as the basis for Christian doctrine are not clear.

3) Comprehensive

A scriptural quotation can be considered comprehensive when it articulates the basic elements of the doctrine it is called upon to support. The Jewish doctrine on the issue of idolatry is fully articulated in the passage of Deuteronomy 4:9-39. A complete doctrinal statement can be formulated by simply paraphrasing the words of scripture. The doctrine can be summed up with the following words. “We worship the God who revealed Himself to our ancestors at Sinai, as He revealed Himself to our ancestors at Sinai, and in the manner that our ancestors preserved that revelation”. All of these concepts are clearly spelled out in the aforementioned passage.

Similarly, a complete doctrinal statement on the matter of forgiveness from sin can be formulated on the basis of the passage in Ezekiel 33:10-20. The Jewish doctrine can be summed up with the following words. “We believe that God does not hold the sins of the sinner against him when he repents from his evil ways”. The complete concept is spelled out in this passage from the book of Ezekiel.

The passages quoted by the proponents of Christianity are far from comprehensive. The complete amalgamation of all the scriptural quotations presented by the missionary still leaves basic gaps in the missionary argument. Even when the missionary applies the most radical Christian interpretation to scripture, he still will not come up with a passage that can be read as a commandment to direct religious devotion to Jesus. The most radical Christian reading of scripture will still not produce a single verse that associates faith in an individual with forgiveness from sin. The scriptural quotations of the missionary are not comprehensive. They fail to uphold some of the most basic elements of their doctrines.

In conclusion we can say that the scriptural quotations presented in support of Judaism are direct, comprehensive and clear, while the quotations of the Church are circuitous, incomplete and vague. The sum-total of the disparity between these two sets of scriptural quotations is that the Jew relies on God, the Divine Author of scripture, while the Christian must have faith in the wisdom of biased Christian scholars. For the Jew, it is God who tells him that the given passage is talking about the issue at hand. For the Christian, it is the missionary who must tell him that the passage quoted is presenting a teaching on the theological issue under discussion. For the Jew, it is the Divine Author of scripture who made the message clear and understandable. The Christian needs the scholar to create clarity out of confusion. For the Jew, it is God who spells out the complete doctrine in the prophetic texts. The Christian must rely on the theologian to piece together a doctrine from the available fragments.

When we stand back and look at the big picture, it becomes clear that it is Judaism that is loyal to the Authorial intent of scripture, while Christianity misappropriates the scripture. We can more readily appreciate the statement of a former missionary who converted to Judaism. “The Bible is the most powerful counter-missionary book ever published”.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Daniel 7 and Acceptance of Scripture – an Open Letter to Bru

Daniel 7 and Acceptance of Scripture – an Open Letter to Bru

Bru

You have come to this blog to share what you understand as the truth. You quote Scripture in an effort to demonstrate how the theology that you are espousing is the belief of the Author of Scripture. You are hoping that we will accept your theology on the basis of these Scriptures that you quote.

If you expect us to change our theology on the basis of the word of God as recorded in Scripture you should be willing to do the same. You may be thinking that your theology is rooted in the word of God and that you have nothing to change but your lengthy comments demonstrate that your position is NOT rooted in the word of God but in the Christian Scripture as interpreted by the Church of the Seventh Day Adventists.

Allow me to demonstrate. You have interpreted Daniel 7:27 as if it states that all dominions will serve the one who you call “the most high.” The problem with your interpretation is that it is based on a demonstrable mistranslation. The words “kadishei elyonin” do not mean “holy ones of the most high” but rather they mean “holy exalted ones.” Try looking it up in any concordance. The verse is saying that the dominions will serve the nation of holy exalted ones. Since you already correctly surmised that verse 27 is an interpretation of verse 14 you should now realize that the “one like the son of man” is representative of the people of Israel. This would make verse 27 parallel to verse 17 as well as to Isaiah 60:12.

If your theology is truly based on the word of God, you should go about revising your theology now that you realize that you have mistranslated the word of God. But if your theology is based on the Church of the SDA then you will probably stay right where you are.

A deeper question needs to be asked at this point. Who told you to look at these verses in Daniel for the foundations of your theology? Was it the Church of the SDA or was it the Author of Scripture? Which passages does the Author of Scripture point you to when it comes to the question of who it is that we are to worship? Is it this passage in Daniel or is it perhaps a different set of passages altogether? If you truly accept the authority of Scripture why then will you not let the Author of the book tell you what is important, what is not and which passages are teachings on which subjects?

Oh, before I forget allow me to address your assertion about the “ability” of God to “become a man.” Do you believe that God could become insane? Could He become confused? Could He become “not God”? He can do anything, can’t He?

I will humbly suggest that you read these articles, not so that you accept the theology that I believe is true but to help you see how you have been misled into thinking that the teachings of the SDA Church are the teachings of the Jewish Scripture.

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/incarnation-and-definition-of-marriage/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/landscape-of-the-bible-excerpt-from-c-u/

http://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/answers/jewish-polemics/texts/scriptural-studies/blumenthal/the-totality-of-scripture/

Posted in Correspondence | 41 Comments

What does the Bible Really say about Christianity

Originally posted on 1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources:

What does the Bible Really say about Christianity

Most counter-missionary articles will tell you what the Bible does NOT say about Christianity. The typical counter-missionary essay will study a passage from the Bible that missionaries quote as if it were a prophecy about Jesus, and demonstrate why in fact the passage has nothing to do with Jesus.

But does the Bible say nothing about Christianity? The Jewish prophets gave the Jewish people an understanding of the future that will befall them. The fact is that Christianity and the Church played a large role in the history of Israel. We would expect that this world religion would deserve some mention in the writings of the prophets.

Before we begin our search let us clarify to ourselves what it is that we are searching for. The audience of the Jewish prophets is obviously the Jewish people (Psalm 147:19). We must look at…

View original 1,214 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment